162 AI tools reviewed with real pricing, quickstart code, and honest gotchas
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates
Claude is the developer's favorite companion right now, primarily due to the 3.5 Sonnet model's superior coding logic and the 'Artifacts' UI which turns chat into a live IDE. While ChatGPT aims for a multimodal consumer assistant, Claude focuses on deep work, reasoning, and project generation. It is a 'must-have' for frontend devs and systems architects, but casual users looking for image generation or voice chat might find it sterile.
ChatGPT remains the 'default' AI for a reason—it is the Swiss Army knife that defines the baseline for the entire industry. The $20/month Plus plan is virtually mandatory for serious developers to access the 'o1' reasoning models and avoid the aggressive rate limits of the free tier. However, for pure coding contexts, specialized tools like Cursor or Copilot often provide a better IDE-integrated experience.
Canva has successfully pivoted from a simple design tool to a full-blown 'Creative OS' powered by AI. For developers, the real story isn't just the UI—it's the Connect API and Apps SDK, which let you piggyback on their 220M+ MAU. However, the recent aggressive price hikes for teams suggest they are squeezing their dominance. Use it if you need to embed rock-solid design features into your app; avoid it if you need cheap, scalable team collaboration.
Bolt.new is currently the most impressive browser-based AI engineer because it actually runs the code it writes—backend and all—inside your browser. Unlike v0 which is UI-focused, Bolt attempts full-stack logic, though it burns through tokens rapidly if you aren't careful. Use it for spinning up new projects or prototypes in minutes; avoid it for refactoring massive legacy monoliths where the context window will choke.
PydanticAI is the 'adult in the room' for Python agent frameworks. While others prioritize flashiness or drag-and-drop UIs, PydanticAI doubles down on what matters for production: type safety, testing, and observability. If you already love Pydantic and FastAPI, this will feel like home—it forces you to define strict schemas for your agents, preventing the common 'string soup' errors of other frameworks. It is NOT for developers who want a low-code experience or those who hate type hints. Its `pydantic-graph` library is a serious competitor to LangGraph for building stateful multi-agent systems.
Agno (formerly Phidata) is the 'sports car' of agent frameworks—stripping away the bloat of graph-based systems for raw speed and Pythonic simplicity. It's excellent for developers who want to build multi-agent teams using standard Python code rather than learning a complex new DSL. However, if you rely heavily on the massive pre-built integration ecosystem of LangChain, you might find Agno's leaner approach limiting.
The OpenAI Agents SDK is the 'grown-up' version of the experimental Swarm framework, finally giving devs a clean, opinionated way to build multi-agent systems without the bloat of LangChain. It excels at explicit orchestration—where you define exactly how Agent A hands off to Agent B—making debugging significantly easier than 'magical' autonomous loops. It is strictly for developers who want code-first control and are comfortable managing their own state persistence; if you want a fully managed, server-side agent backend, this is NOT it (stick to the Responses API or cloud-native wrappers).
LangGraph is the 'adult in the room' for agent frameworks—trading the magic of prompt-chains for the reliability of state machines. While frameworks like CrewAI offer a friendly role-playing interface, LangGraph gives you raw, deterministic control over loops, persistence, and human approvals. It is the only choice for production engineers who need to guarantee that an agent won't hallucinate itself into an infinite loop, but hobbyists will find the verbose graph definitions exhausting.
Google ADK is the enterprise answer to the 'wild west' of agent frameworks. Unlike hobbyist tools, it treats agents as serious software components with strict typing, safety checks, and deployment manifests. It is the go-to choice if you are already in the Google Cloud/Gemini ecosystem and need to ship reliable agents to production, but it feels restrictive if you want to remain truly cloud-agnostic.
CrewAI is the 'Rails' of agent frameworks—opinionated, productive, and accessible. It excels for developers who want to spin up a team of agents (Researcher, Writer, Editor) without getting bogged down in graph theory or complex state machines. However, if you need granular control over every state transition or are building for a non-Python stack, look elsewhere. Use it for rapid assembly of intelligent workflows; avoid it if you need bare-metal control over the cognitive architecture.
Composio is the plumbing layer every agent developer wishes they didn't have to build themselves. It excels at handing 'Auth & Actions'—abstracting away the nightmare of OAuth tokens and API schema maintenance so your agent can actually *do* things. Use it if you're building a coding agent or an assistant that needs to touch real SaaS data; avoid it if you just need simple no-code automation (use Zapier) or massive data syncing (use Nango).
CAMEL is the academic heavyweight of agent frameworks, treating multi-agent systems as a 'society of minds' rather than just a task queue. It's brilliant for researchers and data scientists needing to generate high-quality synthetic data or simulate complex social interactions (like their 1-million agent OASIS demo). However, if you just want to build a simple customer support bot or a production cron job, stick to CrewAI or LangGraph—CAMEL's role-playing abstraction is overkill for basic automation.
