Newsletter
Join the Community
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates
LangGraph is the 'adult in the room' for agent frameworks—trading the magic of prompt-chains for the reliability of state machines. While frameworks like CrewAI offer a friendly role-playing interface, LangGraph gives you raw, deterministic control over loops, persistence, and human approvals. It is the only choice for production engineers who need to guarantee that an agent won't hallucinate itself into an infinite loop, but hobbyists will find the verbose graph definitions exhausting.
LangGraph is the "adult in the room" for agent frameworks—trading the magic of prompt-chains for the rigid reliability of state machines. While tools like CrewAI offer a friendly role-playing interface where you just tell an agent to "be a researcher," LangGraph forces you to define exactly how data flows between steps using nodes and edges. It is effectively a library for building cyclic computational graphs, making it the only serious choice for engineers who need to guarantee an agent won't hallucinate itself into an infinite loop.
The cost trade-off is stark. The open-source library is free (MIT license), but if you use the managed LangGraph Cloud, the pricing is aggressive. A workload processing 5,000 documents/day with a 5-step agent workflow equals roughly 750,000 node executions/month. On LangGraph Cloud, after the 100k free tier, you pay $0.001 per node plus uptime fees, easily pushing bills past $800/month before you even pay for LLM tokens. Self-hosting the library on a $50/month VPS is the obvious move for high-volume production apps, provided you have the DevOps chops to manage the persistence layer yourself.
Technically, LangGraph excels at "human-in-the-loop" patterns. Its checkpointer system saves the state of an agent after every step, allowing you to pause execution, wait for a human to approve a draft, and then resume days later from the exact same state. This is nearly impossible to do reliably in conversational frameworks like AutoGen. However, the developer experience is verbose. A simple linear chain that takes 3 lines in LangChain might take 20 lines of graph definition here. You aren't just writing prompts; you are architecting a system.
Skip LangGraph if you are building a quick prototype or a simple chatbot; the setup time isn't worth it. Use it if you are building a complex, long-running agentic workflow (like a coding assistant or a support bot) where state persistence and deterministic control flow are non-negotiable requirements.
The open-source library is 100% free with no hidden limits. The "gotcha" lies in LangGraph Cloud (managed hosting). It offers a free tier of 100k node executions/month, but scales to $0.001 per node execution thereafter. Crucially, Cloud also charges "uptime fees" for keeping agents active ($0.0036/min for production), which can silently double your bill. For a standard heavy workload, self-hosting via Docker is practically mandatory to avoid paying 10x the infrastructure cost of a simple VM.
Production-grade but verbose. It creates a CompiledGraph that behaves like a standard LangChain Runnable, making integration seamless if you already use the ecosystem. Native support for cyclic graphs (loops) and persistence (Postgres/SQLite checkpointers) is best-in-class. Documentation is dense but accurate. Expect to write significant boilerplate code defining TypedDict states and conditional edges before your agent does anything.
# pip install langgraph
from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END
from typing import TypedDict
class State(TypedDict): count: int
def step(s): return {"count": s["count"] + 1}
workflow = StateGraph(State)
workflow.add_node("step", step)
workflow.add_edge(START, "step")
workflow.add_edge("step", END)
print(workflow.compile().invoke({"count": 0}))TypedDict schema for your state; dynamic data passing is painful.