162 AI tools reviewed with real pricing, quickstart code, and honest gotchas
Subscribe to our newsletter for the latest news and updates
OpenAI's embedding API is the 'nobody ever got fired for buying IBM' of vector search—it's cheap, reliable, and integrated into everything. Use 'text-embedding-3-small' for 95% of use cases; it's virtually free ($0.02/1M tokens) and supports variable dimensions to save on vector DB costs. Avoid it if you need absolute state-of-the-art retrieval accuracy (look at Voyage or BGE-M3) or strict on-prem privacy requirements.
Nomic Embed is the 'good guy' of the embedding world—releasing not just weights but the actual training data, which is unheard of from OpenAI or Cohere. Use `v1.5` if you need a massive 8k context window for RAG over large documents; it's a workhorse that beats OpenAI's older models and trades blows with the new ones. Avoid the new `v2 MoE` model if you need long context, as it's capped at 512 tokens, though it's superior for multilingual tasks.
Mixedbread is a hidden gem for developers who want the performance of OpenAI's large embeddings but with the flexibility of open source. Their 'Matryoshka' models are a game-changer, allowing you to truncate vectors to save 50%+ on storage without retraining. Use this if you need high-performance, self-hostable English embeddings or want to optimize vector DB costs; avoid if you need deep multilingual support or 8k+ token context windows.
Jina Embeddings is the 'senior engineer's choice' for complex RAG systems, offering features others ignore like variable output dimensions (Matryoshka) and native late interaction (ColBERT). It shines in multilingual and multimodal scenarios where OpenAI falls short. However, its CC-BY-NC license on 'open' weights is a trap for commercial self-hosters—if you're building a for-profit product, be prepared to pay for the API or an enterprise license.
Vertex AI embeddings are the industrial-grade choice for teams already in the Google ecosystem. The new `gemini-embedding-001` model finally adds Matryoshka support and competitive MTEB scores (~68.3), making it a serious rival to OpenAI. Use it if you need enterprise compliance and massive scale; avoid it if you just want a simple API key without managing IAM permissions.
Cohere Embed is the 'senior engineer's choice' for enterprise RAG—prioritizing noise robustness and real-world retrieval over raw academic benchmarks. While OpenAI's embeddings are the default, Cohere's v4 model outshines them with a 128k context window, native multimodal support, and Matryoshka embeddings that let you slash vector storage costs by up to 96%. Use this if you're building serious multilingual search or need to embed complex documents; skip it if you just need a cheap, simple vector for a side project.
BGE is the go-to open-source choice for developers who want state-of-the-art embedding performance without paying OpenAI or Cohere. The BGE-M3 model is a technical marvel, offering hybrid retrieval (dense + sparse) in a single pass, while the newer BGE-Multilingual-Gemma2 tops benchmarks with a massive 74.1 score. Use it if you can manage self-hosting or use a provider like DeepInfra; avoid it if you just want a simple, managed API endpoint and don't care about squeezing out the last 5% of retrieval accuracy.
Alibaba GTE is currently one of the strongest contenders in the open-weight embedding space, particularly if you need multilingual support or handle long documents (up to 32k tokens). The Qwen2-7B-instruct model is a beast on the MTEB leaderboard, but it's also a heavy 7B parameter model—making it overkill for simple app search but perfect for complex RAG. If you don't want to manage the infrastructure, their API (text-embedding-v4) is dirt cheap at $0.07/1M tokens. Use this if you need top-tier accuracy and context; avoid self-hosting the 7B version if you are resource-constrained.
Snorkel is the 'Software 2.0' approach to data labeling—built for data scientists who would rather write code than click bounding boxes. It excels at classifying millions of documents or text records by combining noisy signals (heuristics) into high-quality labels, but it is overkill and overpriced for small teams needing simple manual annotation. If you are an enterprise fine-tuning an LLM on proprietary data, this is a superpower; if you are a startup needing 500 images labeled, look elsewhere.
Scale AI is the 'gold standard' for data labeling, effectively functioning as the utility company for the AI industry. If you are OpenAI or the DoD, this is your vendor; they practically invented modern RLHF workflows and have an army of human labelers that no software-only tool can match. However, for 95% of developers, it is overkill—pricing is opaque (expect $50k+ contracts), and the self-serve tier feels like an afterthought. Use it if you need massive scale or specialized 3D/LLM data; avoid it if you just need to label 500 images for a side project.
Lilac is the developer's choice for 'cleaning the garbage' out of LLM training data before it costs you money. It excels at visualizing dataset clusters to find hidden patterns, PII, and duplicates without sending data to a third-party cloud. Use it if you are fine-tuning models and need to sanitize your inputs locally; avoid it if you need a managed team labeling workflow for computer vision.
Labelbox has successfully pivoted from a pure computer vision tool to a full-stack 'data factory' for GenAI and LLMs. It is the go-to choice for enterprise teams needing serious compliance (HIPAA/SOC2) and advanced RLHF workflows, but it is overkill and overpriced for solo developers or simple hobby projects. If you aren't building a foundation model or fine-tuning an LLM at scale, open-source alternatives like Label Studio are likely a better fit.
